LARS Ligament Procedure

Lennard Funk, updated 2024

The LARS ligament has been my preferred technique for most AC Joint dislocations since 2006, for reasons below.

Ligaments used to repair the AC Joint need to have capacity to bear the heavy load of the upper limb, thus it is important that they have adequate structure and biomechnical integrity to act as a scaffold while the tissue regenerates.

Due to complications and poor outcomes with past techniques, most surgeons are now advocating to anatomically reconstruct the coracoclavicular ligaments. Studies have shown that anatomical reconstructions better match the stiffness of the native coracoclavicular ligament and gives better results than with past non-anatomic methods.

The LARS ligament reproduces the anatomy and mechanics of the torn coracoclavicular ligaments and acts as a reinforcement to allow the coracoclavicular ligament to heal and grow into the synthetic fibres. They allow immediate mobilisation with no material through the joint. The fixation is via two bony tunnels and not an "over-the-top" approach, thus reducing clavicular erosions. The use of loop techniques offers the possibility of an earlier return to work especially in younger, active patients or ones with a high-grade dislocation.

About the LARS Ligament:

LARS ligaments are intended for the reconstruction of ruptured ligaments. The LARS ligaments have longitudinal-running fibres that match the structure of native human tissue. They therefore are able to act as a scaffold for fibroblastic culture and good healing.

LARS is a synthetic Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction device, designed to mimic the normal anatomic ligament fibres. The intra-articular longitudinal fibres resist fatigue and allow fibroblastic ingrowth. The extra-articular woven fibres provide strength and resistance to elongation.

The material used is polyethylene terephthalate - an industrial-strength polyester fibre which has the ideal characteristics for ligament replacement applications. Each type of LARS ligament contains a specific number and length of fibres, depending on the intended use, and varying leaders to facilitate passage through the bony tunnels.

Biological and mechanical testing on resistance, fatigue and creep have shown that LARS ligaments are highly effective ligament reconstruction and augmentation devices, and long-term clinical results are excellent. Biopsies done on the LARS ligament have shown complete cellular and connective tissue ingrowth, along with the presence of some endothelial cells suggesting vascularisation of the tissue. Research into the success of the LARS ligament in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament compared to the gold standard bone-patellar tendon-bone graft have shown comparable results with no adverse reactions, indicating good biocompatibility of LARS (Trieb, Blahovic, 2003). Strength tests done on the LARS ligament have shown that it is quite resistant to torsion and traction, as well as to flexion and residual stretching.

There is no risk of tissue rejection as it is biocompatibility with the body's native tissue. Tests on the ligament showed no evidence of inflammatory, immunological or infectious reactions with human tissue. Human cells were seen to attach to and develop on the LARS fibres in both the intra and extra-articular parts. These factors are good evidence of its biocompatibility and are another reason for its success in reconstruction.Other tests on the ligament showed there to be a very low rate of residual stretching thus the shoulder will not become unstable. The ligament was shown to be have no reduction in mechanical resilience after over 10 million wear cycles that tested the effects torsion, traction and flexion (CM Orthopaedic, 2006). Thus the LARS reconstruction is a very strong and reliable method of reconstruction that will imitate the native ligament to a high degree.

After the operation the patient will require a sling for comfort only 3 weeks and can gradually mobilise the shoulder a few days after surgery. The patient should have passive motion within 2 days, active motion within 6 days and be able to return to work in 4 weeks.

With this early rehabilitation there is less atrophy of surrounding muscle compared with older techniques. The technique allows natural rotation and movement of the clavicle so the patient can return to normal activity with no restrictions and there should be little or no post-operative pain.

Results documented by the official LARS ligament distributors have shown that with the use of LARS 90% of patients were pain free, 95% had no swelling and 86% of patients have no restrictions to movement postoperatively.

LARS ligaments have been in clinical in use for over 30 years. There are many studies and publications supporting the use of LARS for many indications.


Surgical Technique

SURGICAL VIDEO PRESENTATION (YouTube for 18+ viewers only)

 Incision & Approach

  • A 3-5cm incision is made in the sagittal plane extending up from the coracoid over the clavicle (blue arrows). Transverse incisions can lead to poor scars.

  • The medial 5cm of the deltoid can be divided off the clavicle and reflected laterally creating a flap for later repair.

  • The AC joint and lateral clavicle are then exposed. The coracoid is exposed by blunt dissection.

Preparation

  • Two oblique drill holes are made in the lateral clavicle, either side of the coracoid. The lateral tunnel is oblique forward and the medial tunnel oblique backwards.
  • The 3.5 mm drill bit is used for the LAC 20 ligament and the 4.5 mm drill for the LAC 30 CK.
  • When the drilling the tunnels, place a retractor on the inferior aspect of the clavicle, to prevent any damage when the drill bit exits.
  • Ensure that the drill bit is central on the bone so as to not damage the anterior and postererior cortices.



Passing the Ligament:

  • The wire guide, with a loaded wire, is passed medially under the coracoid, from medial to lateral.



  • Expose the end of the wire passer and set up the wire-passer cannula. Turn it several times to get the top of the hook free from the fibrous tissues which may be interposed. Insert the drift to complete the free passage for the wire loop.

  • Push the wire loop through whilst removing the cannula.

  • Load the ligament in the wire loop and pull the guide through and out, thus passing the ligament around the coracoid.

  • The ligament is passed under the coracoid, by pulling on the wire guide as it is removed from under the coracoid.

  • Wire loops are passed through the clavicular tunnels, pulling the ligament through each tunnel.



Reducing the AC Joint:

  • Tension is created by pulling alternately on each side, whilst holding the reduction of the AC joint.
  • We like to use a bone reduction forceps to assist with the reduction, with one side under the coracoid and the other over the lateral clavicle.

Passing the Interference Screws:

  • The ligament ends are fixed in the bony tunnels with titanium interference screws. The two diameter screws available are 4.7 x 15 mm or 5.2 x 15 mm.
  • Use the 4.7 screw for the LAC 20 ligament and the 5.2 screw for the LAC 30.

  • The ends of the ligament are cut flush to the superior aspect of the clavicle, leaving no troublesome projections.
  • The reduction is confirmed by assessing the height and translation in relation to the acromion.

Closure:

  • The incision is closed by suturing together the trapezo-deltoid fascia and reattaching the lateral deltoid.


Post-operative x-rays:


Wound at 6 weeks:


Modifications

I have modified the technique to further strengthen the repair in two ways:
1. By passing the excess ligament around the coracoid again and then
tying it sub-deltoid in a figure-of-eight configuration


2. By passing the excess lateral ligament through another 3.5mm
oblique drill hole in the acromion and then back to the medial
ligament passed under the coracoid again. This recreates the
acromio-clavicular ligaments, as well as the coraco-clavicular
ligaments and is used for revision cases and those with poor tissue quality. I will often add biological reinforcement to aid healing - biceps flip / CAL Transfer / Hamsting Allograft or Autograft - depending on the patient factors.

Surgical Technique PDF (Corin):

Surgical Technique Videos:

SURGICAL VIDEO PRESENTATION (YouTube for 18+ viewers only)

 


Further Reading:

  1. Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction with the LARS ligament in professional versus non-professional athletes. GM Marcheggiani Muccioli, C Manning, P Wright, A Grassi, S Zaffagnini, ...Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 24, 1961-1967 
  2. Robinson, Paul M; Kanthasamy, Senthooran; Funk, Lennard; ",A Surgical Technique for Revision of Failed Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction,Techniques in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery,21,2,37-41,2020,LWW
  3. France, J., Shahane, S., Sinha, A. and Prasad, G., 2024. An In Vitro Study Demonstrating the Significance of Acromioclavicular Ligament Repair in Restoring Horizontal and Rotational Acromioclavicular Joint Stability. Cureus16(3).
  4. Tiefenboeck, T.M., Boesmueller, S., Popp, D., Payr, S., Joestl, J., Binder, H., Schurz, M., Komjati, M., Fialka, C. and Ostermann, R.C., 2018. The use of the LARS system in the treatment of AC joint instability–Long-term results after a mean of 7.4 years. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research104(6), pp.749-754.
  5. Lu, N., Zhu, L., Ye, T., Chen, A., Jiang, X., Zhang, Z., Zhu, Q., Guo, Q. and Yang, D., 2014. Evaluation of the coracoclavicular reconstruction using LARS artificial ligament in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy22, pp.2223-2227.
  6. Geraci, Alessandro; Riccardi, Alberto; Montagner, Isabella Monia; Pilla, Dario; Camarda, Lawrece; D’Arienzo, Antonio; D’arienzo, Michele; ",Acromion clavicular joint reconstruction with LARS ligament in acute dislocation,Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery,7,2,143,2019,Mashhad University of Medical Science